Beauty in Cleats...
The number of children playing team sports is falling, with experts blaming a parent-driven focus on elite travel clubs, specialization in one sport and pursuit of scholarships for hurting the country's youth sports leagues.
Baseball, basketball, softball, soccer and touch football -- long staples of American childhood -- have all taken hits, worrying public health advocates, league organizers and professional sports organizations.
More than 26 million children ages 6 to 17 played team sports in 2014, down nearly 4 percent from 2009, according to a widely cited survey by the Sports and Fitness Industry Association. Total sports played have plummeted by nearly 10 percent.
Some of the drop-off is attributable to the recession, particularly in low-income urban areas. But experts fear larger socioeconomic forces are in play, especially in the suburbs, where the shift to elite competition over the past two decades has taken a growing toll: Children are playing fewer sports, and the less talented are left behind in recreational leagues with poor coaching, uneven play and the message that they aren't good enough. Seventy percent of kids quit sports by age 13.
"The system is now designed to meet the needs of the most talented kids," said Mark Hyman, a professor of sports management at George Washington University and the author of several books on youth sports. "We no longer value participation. We value excellence."
And those studying the issue say they know whom to blame: parents.
"The adults have won," Hyman said. "If we wiped the slate clean and reinvented youth sports from scratch by putting the physical and emotional needs of kids first, how different would it look? Nothing would be recognizable."
The Aspen Institute, the Clinton Foundation, and several amateur and professional sports organizations are working on solutions. Officials came together last month for a roundtable at the U.S. Open tennis tournament in New York and earlier this year at a Washington summit attended by the U.S. surgeon general. Dick's Sporting Goods is appealing directly to customers, asking for donations at the checkout counter for Sports Matter, its new program to pump money into underfunded youth sports teams.
The toughest problem, Hyman said, is that no parent wants to "unilaterally disarm" and acknowledge that the system is broken.
"It's just about impossible to stand up to it if you want your kids to play competitively," said Elizabeth Pelcyger, a Washington mom whose son felt pressure even from his baseball teammates because he wasn't playing year-round. "They could somehow point out that he hadn't been playing since he was 4."
Many of the adults trying to fix the problem remember a simpler, less competitive, less expensive time in youth sports. There were no travel teams, no faraway tournaments -- now a $7 billion industry. There were pickup games with friends and leagues at neighborhood parks, with the focus mostly on fun. All of the kids in the neighborhood played together: the stars, the stalwarts, the daisy pickers. One of the most popular movies in the 1970s: "The Bad News Bears."
Amazingly, kids still made it to the major leagues.
"Sports was everything in my life," said Dick's chief executive Edward W. Stack, who played baseball and football. "I don't remember every teacher I had, but I remember every coach I had. If I didn't have those things, I don't know what I would have done."
Although Wall Street analysts have expressed some concern about how participation drops could affect the sporting goods business, Stack says: "The whole problem is very personal to me. This is not about business. I saw how my life was impacted though sports."
Parent bragging rights
There is little debate over the value of playing sports for children, although the risk of concussions in contact sports, particularly football, has become a concern for parents, pediatricians and coaches. Still, active kids are less likely to be obese and are more likely to have higher test scores, attend college and have higher incomes. And when active kids become parents, they start the process again with their children. Built on Gatorade and shin guards, it is a virtuous, wholesome loop.
That is the idea. It is no longer the reality.
In the past two decades, sports has become an investment to many parents, one that they believe could lead to a college scholarship, even though the odds are bleak. Parents now start their kids in sports as toddlers, jockey to get them on elite travel teams, and spend small fortunes on private coaching, expensive equipment, swag and travel to tournaments.
Youth sports is the new keeping up with the Joneses.
"The parents try to one-up each other," said Tony Korson, founder of Koa Sports, a nonprofit sports league in Montgomery County that tries to provide an alternative to the youth sports status quo, with trained coaches and encouragement of multiple sports. "You get one parent who says, 'I traveled to Tennessee for a tournament.' Another says, 'Well I flew to California.' And then, 'Oh my son is going to Puerto Rico.' "
Some parents -- usually those on the outside -- look at the situation with astonishment.
"What I want to know is why there are so many families that are into travel sports?" asked one poster on DC Urban Moms and Dads, a popular online chat board. Someone answered: "Honestly I think there are many parents who like it," adding, "in their own mind they are thrilled at their son being an 'elite' athlete." Another person replied: "What playing a travel/club sport can do is take a kid who is a decent athlete and give them a leg up."
But nobody bothered to ask the kids what they wanted. Now, researchers are beginning to survey children. Not unsurprisingly, they have a different idea of what youth sports should be.
Amanda Visek, an exercise science professor at George Washington University, recently surveyed nearly 150 children about what they found fun about sports. (Her sample included kids who play travel and recreational sports.) The kids identified 81 factors contributing to their happiness.
Number 48: winning.
Also low on the list: playing in tournaments, cool uniforms and expensive equipment. High on the list: positive team dynamics, trying hard, positive coaching and learning. Whenever Visek presents her findings to win-hungry parents and coaches, there is a lot of pushback.
"They don't want to believe it," she said.
Yet the No. 1 reason why kids quit sports is that it's no longer fun.
Fixing the problem
This is how youth sports looks now: The most talented kids play on travel teams beginning at age 7 (or sometimes younger), even though many athletes bloom much later; the best coaches (often dads who are former college athletes) manage travel teams, leaving rec leagues with helpful but less knowledgeable parents in charge; and coaches of elite teams pressure kids to play only one sport (the one they are coaching), even though studies show this leads to injuries, burnout and athletes who aren't well rounded.
Particularly with specialization, parents believe they are making the right choice in pursuit of a scholarship.
"I'm done trying to tell parents that the odds are against them," said Hyman, the GW professor. "That's a loser's game. They don't want to believe that. The better approach is to tell them that what they're doing is not helping you reach your goal."
Those who study the issue are more worried about the millions of kids who just want to play sports for fun but get the least attention.
"The rec leagues become much less sustainable," said Tom Farrey, a sportswriter running the Aspen Institute's initiative on youth sports. "These kids kind of know they are second-class, and they check out quickly. The quality of coaching isn't as good. The kids fall behind. It becomes a compounding effect."
With traditional team sports in decline -- the number of kids playing touch football is down more than 7 percent, slow-pitch softball down 5 percent, and baseball, basketball and soccer all down nearly 2 percent -- niche sports might be benefiting from some of the quitters. Lacrosse is up nearly 12 percent. Field hockey is up nearly 8 percent.
Meanwhile, the race is on to put solutions in place. The Aspen Institute has made eight recommendations, including revitalizing in-town leagues, reintroducing free play, encouraging sports sampling, training coaches and, perhaps most important, asking kids what they want.
The largest organizations in sports are making moves. Major League Baseball is partnering with the Positive Coaching Alliance to train youth coaches. The U.S. Tennis Association is encouraging sports sampling and hosting roundtables on the topic. U.S. Youth Soccer is moving next year from 11-on-11 games to 9-on-9 and 7-on-7, which youth sports advocates believe will be more fun and increase skills development.
"Hopefully, these ideas can help change things," Farrey said. "You're not going to change the culture by telling parents to stop acting like fools."
Source: Washington Post
Editorial Note: One of the first pitchers I coached left softball shortly after one year. I asked her why she was leaving. Her response was: "I'm going to dance. My dad knows nothing about dance."
Female coaches were all over the headlines this summer. First was Becky Hammon of the San Antonio Spurs, who became the NBA's first female head coach at Summer League--and brought home the League trophy. Then came the news that Nancy Lieberman will join Hammon in the NBA as assistant coach of the Sacramento Kings. And in football, Jen Welter was the first-ever woman to land a coaching internship in the NFL, though her gig has since ended.
But with school starting back up, some sports fans are now turning their attention back to college athletics. And on campus, the picture for female coaches is decidedly less rosy.
The percentage of women coached by women has declined to an all-time low, even while Title IX, which prohibits sex-based discrimination in any education program or activity that receives federal dollars, has dramatically increased participation numbers for female athletes.
In 1972, when Title IX was signed into law, 90% of women's college teams were coached by women, according to research from the Tucker Center for Research on Girls & Women in Sport. By 2012, that number had fallen to 42.9%. Meanwhile, the percentage of women coaching men's teams at the collegiate level has remained almost exactly the same--around 2%--for the last 40 years, according to Tucker.
The shift is one of the unintended consequences of Title IX, according to researchers. With more money flowing into women's sports, some coaching positions at women's teams have become more lucrative, and so drawn more interest from male coaches. These jobs are also seen as valuable "layovers" for male collegiate coaches who are waiting for chance to "move up" into the men's leagues.
"It's pretty dire," says Nicole M. LaVoi, Tucker's associate director. "It's a complex answer to why that is, but I think at the heart of it is power."
In recent years, billions of dollars have funneled into college athletics coffers, either through lucrative television contracts, taxpayer dollars, booster support or ticket sales. Some of that money has gone into coaching salaries--indeed, a few college football coaches are now the highest-paid public employees in their respective states.Yet none of those top earners are women.
The highest paid male coach in college sports, Nick Saban of Alabama, earned around $7 million. The highest paid female coaches in college sports, such as Sherri Coale of Oklahoma, make about one seventh of that, around $1 million.
And, while the salaries for women's coaches have improved, they continue to lag those of men's coaches. In 2011, head coaches for all women's teams in the BIG 10 conference made less than a third of what the men's coaches pulled in, $149,000 compared with $490,000, according to research from Tucker. The average salary for a college football head coach in the conference was $2.27 million and men's basketball coaches made $1.9 million on average, compared with $365,000 for the head coaches of BIG 10 women's basketball teams.
"Post Title IX, men have enjoyed the opportunity to coach women," LaVoi said, noting that Title IX opened up a plethora of jobs coaching women. "But the women's coaching opportunities have not opened up the same way. You could argue that Title IX has benefitted male coaches more than women coaches."
The case for high coaching salaries, particularly in men's football and basketball, is often that a star leader brings in more enthusiasm--and revenue. However, in 1997, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission published guidance that said that schools must look beyond that, the thinking being that if women's coaches are not being supported equally, it becomes difficult for them to generate the same amount of money as their male counterparts. (Individual schools are required by the Department of Education to publicly disclose data related to the equity in athletics.)
Tucker analyzed 76 schools, assigning letter grades based on the percentage of women serving as the head coaches of women's teams. An underwhelming nine schools (11.8%) received an A or B grade--while half received Ds or Fs. Only three institutions (Cincinnati, Texas and the University of Miami) received As for being above average when compared to peer institutions and at least one school, Oklahoma State, didn't have any women head coaches for women's teams.
The lack of women in coaching and leadership roles in collegiate sports is "devastating,"says Deborah Slaner Larkin, chief executive of the Women's Sports Foundation. Not only does it lower the potential career ceiling for women in athletics, but it also means fewer female role models.
Neena Chaudhry, senior counsel and director of equal opportunities in athletics for the National Women's Law Center, says she regularly hears from female collegiate coaches concerned about retaliation when discussing pay or promotion, although many may not pursue legal claims. Much of what constitutes a gender-based disparity depends on a particular case, she said.
Ironically, female coaches who push hard for what they deserve are sometimes punished for being too aggressive, says Chaudhry: "If they're really tough, they're fired." On the other hand, those qualities are often seen as assets for male coaches, she says.
"If you look at the numbers and see big disparities, that's a red flag," Chaudhry said of the salary gaps between male and female coaches. "Clearly coaching makes all the difference."
Source: Fortune Magazine
A Brooksville bank executive faces fraud charges after authorities say he stole more than $140,000 from a youth sports league where he was a treasurer.
Source: Tampa Tribune
Jordyn Kleman was flattered that NCAA Division I softball programs were taking notice of what she accomplished at La Crosse Logan High School, but she was never blinded by the opportunities they were willing to give her.
If one of them provided the best fit for her future, she'd play there. But during no part of the recruiting process was the pitcher inclined to be a Division I player just to say she was a Division I player.
The Warriors were 46-14 and won the the NSIC Tournament last season. They qualified for the Division II Midwest regional but lost their first two games.
Source: Winona Daily News
In 11 years, Angie Ryan changed the culture of Forest Lake softball.
"We still have tons of high-caliber kids coming up in the youth program; they are going to be awesome," Ryan said.
"It's been so fun being a part of this softball community and working with such amazing kids. They are extremely hardworking, talented, smart, fun young women. I'm
going to miss them tremendously; they are second to none."
Source: Forest Lake Times
Blue Krush softball coaches, parents and players met with Luverne's Park and Recreation Board Monday evening to request a change in park rental pricing.
Source: Greenville Advocate